Funding, Publications & Communication
Tell the story your data deserves.
Use this for
-
You’re aiming for Horizon/IHI/EIC or national grants and need a sharp aims + WPs set.
-
You want a whitepaper/manuscript reviewers can follow (and cite).
-
Investors/BD want an evidence dataroom.
-
You have results, but not a narrative that sticks (figures, claims, limits).
What you walk away with
- Manuscript/whitepaper — reviewer-grade methods, figures that teach, clean references.
-
Grant pack — aims, work packages, Gantt, budget logic, risk plan.Evidence dataroom — index, folder structure, protocols, analysis, one-pagers, reproducibility bundle.
-
HEOR scoping — outcomes/economic angle, data gaps, next-study plan.
-
Comms guardrails — claims language: what to say now vs later; media-safe phrasing.
Patterns we reach for
-
Figures first — if the figure can’t teach it, the text can’t save it.
-
Reviewer brain — methods clear enough to re-run, limits named up front.
-
Traceability — data → code → figure has a trail you can show.
-
PRISMA discipline (when a review’s involved): protocol, screening logs, flow diagram.
-
Claim safety — promises bounded; future work explicit.
Quality gates
-
Claims ↔ evidence table (source + date + strength).
-
Reproducibility: code/notebook runs clean; versions locked.
-
References: consistent style, DOIs checked.
-
Readability: title/abstract/figures pass the “busy reviewer” test.
-
Compliance: page/word/figure limits hit; policies (data/code/embargo) stated.
Rapid · 2–3 weeks
Grant/manuscript sprint
- Aims page + outline, figure set v1, reviewer-style methods framework.
- Hit-list of gaps and the fastest path to close them.
Build · 4–6 weeks
Submission pack
- Full draft (whitepaper/manuscript or grant body), figures/tables, references.
- Dataroom core (index, protocols, analysis, one-pagers) + comms guardrails.
Oversight (Monthly/Quarterly)
Review & response/dataroom upkeep
- Reviewer response packs, figure fixes, cover letters.
- Keep the dataroom current; add new results without chaos.
Example runs
EIC Transition: aims/WPs + partner roles, risk plan, figure-first narrative.
Neurotech whitepaper: pipeline diagrams, effect sizes, limitations.
Seed/Series A dataroom: evidence tables, reproducibility notes, IOI-ready one-pagers.
Journal submission: formatting, references, rebuttal pack with annotated diffs.
Boundaries
-
We can’t polish noise into signal.
-
Acceptance isn’t guaranteed; it’s all about clarity and credibility.
-
We won’t do the actual submission but prepare a pack reviewers can follow.
-
Make results readable—and fundable.
Turn ideas into results that travel.
Book a 15-minute consultation or request the publications/grants starter pack.
FAQ
Do you format to specific calls/journals?
Yes—templates, word/figure limits, sectioning, and checklists.
Can you help with reviewer responses?
Yes—strategy, edits, figure revisions, point-by-point tables.
Will you handle references and data availability?
We deliver clean citations plus a data/code availability statement that fits your policy.
Can you produce a press-friendly version?
Yes—media-safe summary, quotes, and visuals aligned with claims guardrails.
Do you do HEOR?
We scope outcomes and economics, identify data gaps, and sketch the plan; full HTA lives with your HEOR partner.
Need Some Help?
Feel free to contact us for any inquiry or book a free consultation.
